Posts Tagged ‘breast augmentation surgery’

What Is The Expected Lifespan Of Cohesive Gel Implants?

June 20th, 2011

Practically every American woman would unanimously agree to one improvement in implant design: a longer lasting implant. The expected lifespan of breast implants is only about ten years. After the ten year anniversary of a woman’s breast augmentation surgery, the potential for implant rupture and leakages increases exponentially. Thus, the FDA recommends that all implants must be replaced at or near their ten year anniversary. Thankfully, there appears to be an implant that may be able to last through the ten year mark: the cohesive gel breast implant.

The Gummy Bear breast implant was first made available for breast augmentation surgeries in the early 90′s. At that time in the United States, the silicone gel implant was the subject of extreme controversy which resulted in the FDA’s moratorium on the implant from 1992 to 2006. Quickly following the FDA’s suspension of the implant were thousands of lawsuits filed against silicone implant manufacturers from women claiming their adverse health conditions were directly caused by silicone gel implants. Of course, the lawsuits led to the bankruptcy of several of leading implant manufacturers.

Due to the controversy associated with the silicone gel implant, the FDA is currently conducting a very thorough clinical trial of the cohesive gel breast implant. Until that clinical trial is concluded, the cohesive gel implant can only be acquired by a woman willing to join the FDA’s trial. Although it is unlikely you will be accepted into the program, if you’re truly interested in having these implants for your augmentation surgery you should still apply. You can find out more about the FDA’s clinical trial by scheduling an initial consultation with a plastic surgeon that has agreed to participate in the trial.

Cohesive gel implants and saline implants become increasingly likely to rupture as they age. This is due to their silicone gel becoming weaker with age. The cohesive gel implant does not share the same rupture and leakage risk because it does not contain liquid filler – if its exterior shell ruptures, there is nothing to leak into the bloodstream. Many believe this fact alone makes the cohesive gel implant far superior in design than either the saline or traditional silicone gel implant.

The physical appearance of a cohesive gel implant is identical to the natural slope of a real breast. The implant will maintain that position regardless if the woman is standing, sitting, laying down, or even hanging upside down! Since the implant is a solid mass of gel, it is impervious to the effects of gravity. Early evidence suggests that the cohesive implant will maintain its shape and form for a longer period of time than either the saline implant or the traditional silicone gel implant.

Before you invest your time and energy into having any form of invasive surgery, you should do your own homework and research the pros and cons relating to the procedure. You can learn a lot by reading the experiences other people have had undergoing the exact same surgery you’re considering. While the internet is a perfect place to begin your research, it’s always advisable that you speak directly with at least two board certified plastic surgeon before you make your final decision on having the surgery. You should also consult your family doctor because he or she may know things about your body that might conflict with the surgery itself or the recovery process.

A Comparison Of Breast Implant Pros And Cons

June 17th, 2011

Since breast augmentation surgeries were first offered as a means of enhancing and enlarging a woman’s breast size, the two predominant implants used over the years have been the silicone implant and the saline implant. Both have their pros and cons. There is a new implant that has recently become available in the United States. It is called the cohesive gel implant. This new implant appears to have more pros than cons. Although it’s not approved for unrestricted use at this time, it’s still an option for women who don’t mind joining the FDA’s clinical trial.

Women across the entire globe want bigger breasts. Their primary reasons are pretty obvious: larger, firmer breasts are closely associated with youth and vitality. Thus, women with large, firm breasts are conveying subconscious, visual cues to anyone that notices. The results: breast implants make you look better and (most importantly) feel better about yourself. Your self confidence will be elevated as will your self esteem. When a person improves his or her self confidence, her life will likewise be improved as will her level of life enjoyment.

In the United States, a woman can choose either a traditional silicone gel implant or the saline implant for her breast augmentation surgery. The newer implant, the cohesive gel implant, is not yet available for unrestricted use. However, women who are interested in this type of implant can have it for their surgery if they choose to join the FDA’s clinical trial. As an added benefit for joining the trial, a portion of your surgery costs will either be paid for or reimbursed. It should be noted that it is difficult to become a member of the clinical trial – contact a breast surgeon that is participating in the clinical trial to find out the details.

The silicone device has been available for breast augmentation surgeries for the longest time. Throughout its history, it has been the subject of lawsuits, manufacturer bankruptcies, and even a 14 year moratorium placed on it by the FDA. Yet, despite its difficult history, the implant has the FDA’s stamp of approval and is available for unrestricted use in the United States.

While there are many pros and cons of each type of implant, this article will focus on each implant’s primary drawback and most attractive benefit. Starting with the traditional silicone gel implant, the most notorious trait of the silicone implant is that simple fact that it uses silicone gel as its filler. If the implant leaks its liquid gel into the human body, the gel can cause any number of serious health concerns. Since its filler is the chief characteristic that sets this implant apart from saline or cohesive gel, its potential for health risks will probably never be eliminated.

The primary benefit of this type of implant is its ability to mimic real breast tissue better than any other implant on the market. Both men and women unanimously agree that silicone gel implants offer the most realistic feel (when squeezed) and movement compared to real breast tissue. While this character trait was certainly true for decades, it’s been said that the newer saline implant designs have closed the gap when it comes to mimicking real breast tissue. Of course, the only way you can determine that for yourself is to perform your own squeeze test!

The saline implant’s most notable trait is its filler. The saline solution that is used to inflate the implant device is harmless to the human body. If this implant ruptures and leaks, it deflates within a few days allowing for almost immediate visible detection while its saline is simply absorbed into the body and purged via urination. This implant has rightfully earned the distinction of being the safest implant available. If health and safety are your primary concerns, this implant might be the ideal implant for your augmentation surgery.

The primary drawback to the saline device is its inability to mimic real breast tissue. As mentioned above, the saline implant is believed to be inferior to the silicone device when it comes to feeling like and moving like real breast tissue. However, as also mentioned above, the newer saline devices are believed to mimic real breast tissue as well as the silicone devices. The only way to find out for sure is to ask a breast augmentation surgeon to provide you with both types of implants so you can give them a squeeze to make your own determination.

The cohesive gel implant is also referred to as the Gummy Bear breast implant due to its consistency and feel in the hand. The primary benefit of this implant is that it is impervious to leakage as a result of implant rupture. You can stab one of these implants with a butcher knife and it still won’t leak its filler because it does not contain any liquid whatsoever. Because of this one benefit, some believe that the new cohesive gel implant will rightfully earn a position alongside the saline implant device as one of the safer choices for breast augmentation surgery.

The cohesive gel device’s primary drawback is the simple fact that it is not yet approved by the FDA. The clinical trials are still ongoing and it could be many years before this implant is available for unrestricted use within the United States. It should be noted that the cohesive implant has been in use worldwide for close to twenty years. If a woman wanted this particular implant device for her breast augmentation surgery and the FDA did not approve her for the clinical trial, she does have the option of seeking breast augmentation surgery internationally.